MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387245680 · doi:10.34133/space.0078

Space Noncooperative Target Trajectory Tracking Based on Maneuvering Parameter Estimation

2023· article· en· W4387245680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Science & Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryTracking (education)DiscretizationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceSpacecraftMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The space noncooperative target maneuvering trajectory tracking is essential for the safety of the on-orbit spacecraft. For the noncooperative target, the maneuvering model is complex and changeable. Besides, the maneuvering dynamics model, the operation time, and the maneuvering frequency are previously unknown. It is difficult to achieve high-precision maneuvering trajectory tracking. In this paper, a novel real-time maneuvering trajectory tracking algorithm is developed, in which the maneuvering trajectory of the noncooperative target is discretized first, and then the differential algebra method is utilized to estimate the maneuvering parameter of the noncooperative target in the discretized time. Since the discretized period is very short, the maneuvering parameters of the target in the next discretized time are assumed to be the same as those in the previous discretized time, and the estimated maneuvering parameters are utilized to predict the target’s relative state in the next discretized time to achieve maneuvering trajectory tracking. Compared with the interactive multimodel method (IMM), the proposed method can estimate the maneuvering parameter of the noncooperative target in real time, which greatly reduces the tracking error caused by the mismatching of the target’s maneuvering model. In order to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, a simulation of a noncooperative target’s maneuvering trajectory tracking is provided. The results demonstrated that the proposed method could track the noncooperative target maneuvering in real time, and the estimation accuracy was improved by about 93.07% compared with the IMM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it