MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387252427 · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01800-7

Soil carbon storage capacity of drylands under altered fire regimes

2023· article· en· W4387252427 on OpenAlexaff
Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Peter B. Reich, Sarah E. Hobbie, Corli Coetsee, Benjamin J. Wigley, Edmund C. February, Katerina Georgiou, César Terrer, E. N. Jack Brookshire, Anders Ahlström, Lars Nieradzik, Stephen Sitch, Joe R. Melton, Matthew Forrest, Fang Li, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Chao Yue, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Climate Change · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeNational Park ServiceLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Institute of Food and AgricultureUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEcosystemBiomass (ecology)Soil carbonGrasslandSoil waterCarbon sinkSink (geography)Terrestrial ecosystemFire regimeCarbon cycleAtmospheric sciencesEcologyAgroforestrySoil scienceGeographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The determinants of fire-driven changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) across broad environmental gradients remains unclear, especially in global drylands. Here we combined datasets and field sampling of fire-manipulation experiments to evaluate where and why fire changes SOC and compared our statistical model to simulations from ecosystem models. Drier ecosystems experienced larger relative changes in SOC than humid ecosystems—in some cases exceeding losses from plant biomass pools—primarily explained by high fire-driven declines in tree biomass inputs in dry ecosystems. Many ecosystem models underestimated the SOC changes in drier ecosystems. Upscaling our statistical model predicted that soils in savannah–grassland regions may have gained 0.64 PgC due to net-declines in burned area over the past approximately two decades. Consequently, ongoing declines in fire frequencies have probably created an extensive carbon sink in the soils of global drylands that may have been underestimated by ecosystem models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Climate ChangeSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207