MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387261162 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2315_037

Clinton creek abandoned mine/interim spillway reclamation project—status of the channel restoration effort

2023· article· en· W4387261162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMine closure · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand reclamationInterimSpillwayChannel (broadcasting)Environmental scienceMining engineeringEngineeringArchaeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Clinton Creek Interim Spillway Reclamation Project is located at the site of the former Clinton Creek Asbestos Mine, about 100 kilometres northwest of Dawson City, Yukon Territory, Canada and about 9 kilometres upstream of the confluence of Clinton Creek and the Forty Mile River. The mine was operated from 1968 through 1978 and extracted approximately 12 million Tonnes of serpentine ore from three open pits. Two waste rock dumps were placed along the south side of Clinton Creek. In 1974 the Clinton Creek Waste Rock Dump experienced a mass failure (a lateral spread) resulting in the blockage of the Clinton Creek channel over a reach length of approximately 700 metres, forming a landslide dam and initiating the formation of a new impoundment named Hudgeon Lake. Upon first filling of the new reservoir, the water discharging from Hudgeon Lake began flowing across the surface of the waste rock dam at the interface between the waste rock and the existing colluvial soil and bedrock of the valley slope to the north. The flow began to incise into the soil and waste rock forming the new alignment of Clinton Creek now displaced hundreds of metres to the north and perched some 25 metres above the former Clinton Creek channel and floodplain. The new channel has gradients ranging from about 3% to 6% and averages about 3.6%. This compares to the channel’s original in regime gradient of 0.075%. Erosion of the new channel at the lake outlet prompted concerns about a breach of the landslide dam and efforts to control erosion of the channel using riprap armor and a rock weir, were began in 1981 However, multiple failures during high flow events resulted in damage and the rebuilding of the erosion protection features over the years. In the spring of 2003, an interim spillway structure to arrest the downcutting in Clinton Creek began construction. The design involved a simple trapezoidal channel with a series of drops constructed using rock filled PVC coated galvanized wire gabion baskets. The upper reaches of this spillway structure have held up reasonably well, but the lower reach below what is referred to as Drop Structure No. 4 has experienced multiple severe erosion/headcutting events over time. Subsequent efforts to arrest erosion and stabilize the channel including an articulated concrete block chute structure have also resulted in failure. This paper will describe current, on-going efforts to provide a stable, functioning interim channel that will provide at least a 50-yr facility life and, in the process, address desired improvements in fish habitat and fish migration issues until a final, permanent solution can be funded, designed, and constructed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it