MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P32 The impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy telemonitoring on compliance and the physiological benefits to the OSA patient: a systematic review

2023· review· en· W4387264654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuous positive airway pressureMedicineEpworth Sleepiness ScaleCompliance (psychology)Gold standard (test)AirwayIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyPolysomnographyObstructive sleep apneaInternal medicineSurgeryPsychologyApnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition, involving collapse of the upper airway during sleep, intermittent hypoxia and micro-arousals. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard treatment and recent technological advances have allowed for remote monitoring to provide support and encourage compliance. Although evidence suggests greater benefits for patients with increased CPAP compliance, the role of telemonitoring in providing improved physiological patient benefit through greater compliance is not well established. The aims of this review were to determine the impact of CPAP telemonitoring on compliance and measured physiological outcomes, as compared to traditional CPAP monitoring techniques and to identify an optimal telemonitoring period for long-term compliance and additional physiological benefits. <h3>Method</h3> A systematic review of peer-reviewed English language articles identified using a range of databases and additional resources was performed in line with standard methodology. Articles were assessed according to the following eligibility criteria: adult participants (age &gt;18 years) with a previous diagnosis of OSA; a CPAP telemonitoring intervention in comparison to standard care; and at least one subjectively or objectively measured physiological outcome. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 50 articles were assessed, of which 10 full text articles were eligible to be included in this review (table 1).. Overall, there was a favourable effect associated with increased CPAP compliance in telemonitored groups. Telemonitoring demonstrated favourable effects on Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The optimal CPAP telemonitoring period was calculated at &gt;4 months. CPAP telemonitoring was also shown to significantly improve other physiological outcomes including cholesterol and the Quebec sleep questionnaire (table 2). <h3>Discussion</h3> These findings suggest CPAP telemonitoring as compared to usual care, increases compliance and provides physiological benefits including reducing AHI and ESS. Further research is required to investigate the full physiological benefits of telemonitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it