Transient Thermal Analysis of Concrete Box Girders: Assessing Temperature Variations in Canadian Climate Zones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the temperature distributions and thermal-induced responses in reinforced concrete bridge elements, focusing on the Canadian climate regions. The Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) currently utilizes a fixed thermal gradient profile that does not account for regional climatic variations. Historical environmental data determines the effective maximum temperatures in the CHBDC. In order to investigate temperature behaviors and distributions, a transient finite element (FE) model is developed using recorded and calculated 3-month thermal loads data for representative cities in different climate regions. The results indicate that the predicted daily maximum effective mean temperatures and extreme daily positive vertical thermal gradients do not align. A linear correlation exists between the daily maximum effective mean temperature and the daily maximum air temperature, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.935. The proposed effective mean temperatures obtained from the FE thermal analysis are higher than the CHBDC recommendations. New thermal gradient profiles are proposed for Canadian climate zones, consisting of two straight lines and a linear gradient at the top and bottom sections. A comparison between the proposed profiles and the CHBDC and AASHTO specifications reveals that a single fixed thermal gradient profile is inadequate to account for the variation in thermal gradients across Canadian climate regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".