Mitigation of an open shaft at a legacy mine site in British Columbia, Canada using polyurethane foam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legacy underground mining sites may include the presence of unsecured openings to surface, such as shafts, vent raises, and portals that pose a risk to public and animal safety. This paper presents a case study of the design methodology and use of a polyurethane foam (PUF) plug for the mitigation of an open shaft at a legacy mine site in British Columbia, Canada. Common methods of securing openings to surface include the design and construction of concrete caps or plugs, installation of steel grates, and/or placement of backfill. The method chosen depends on the remediation objectives, desired lifespan, and project setting. Openings in remote locations may require special considerations to optimise cost and reduce impacts on the environment due to the increased difficulty in transporting equipment and materials to the project site. The shaft that is the subject of this paper had previously been backfilled several times with rockfill by the site Owner, but the backfill had either migrated and/or settled over time, eventually resulting in an expression of surface subsidence. The shaft location is within steep terrain and only accessible from an unsanctioned foot and bike trail which limits access with mobile equipment. The use of PUF was advantageous in this situation due to its portability and ability to be hand-mixed and hand-poured into the opening, reducing the need to transport equipment to the project site which would have impacted the surrounding forest terrain. The PUF plug was constructed to prevent further subsidence and seal off access to the shaft to provide a long-term mitigative solution. The plug was required to have sufficient density, strength, and thickness to resist anticipated natural loads, and was designed to incorporate cementitious grout and backfill layers to provide ultraviolet (UV) and fire protection, respectively. An inspection port was also included in the design to facilitate long-term performance monitoring. Technical specifications and a work methodology for mitigating the open shaft with PUF were developed to meet the design basis. A quality assurance program consisting of on-site observations and monitoring of site conditions, as well as sampling of the PUF material for third-party density and strength testing was also carried out. A post-construction monitoring program will be implemented beginning in summer 2023, following snow melt, and will consist of visual monitoring at surface and at depth through the installed inspection port.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".