The importance of the gut microbiome in the development of allergic diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allergic reactions leading to food allergies, asthma or atopic eczema symptoms, are significantly impacted by the gut microbiome.Dysbiosis, an imbalance in gut microbiota, can increase the risk of these conditions.Food allergies are caused by dysregulation in IgE synthesis, but commensal bacteria in the human microbiota can regulate the immune response and prevent the development of food allergies.Exposure to microbes during infancy can positively influence allergy development.Treatment options include food allergy immunotherapy, pharmacological treatments, prebiotics and probiotics.Studies show that the gut microbiota composition differs in individuals with allergic and non-allergic asthma compared to healthy individuals, with higher richness but lower diversity of gut microbiome in asthmatic individuals.The relationship between the intestinal microbiota and the occurrence of atopic eczema is clear, with differences in the number of types of bacteria contributing to the activation of the immune system and the appearance of atopic eczema.Understanding the complex interactions between the gut microbiome and the immune system may lead to new therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases, which have a significant impact on patients' lives. Key woRdsallergy, asthma, eczema, food allergies, gut microbiome, microbiome dysregulation, plant-based diet.sTReszczenie Mikrobiom jelitowy znacząco wpływa na reakcje alergiczne prowadzące do objawów alergii pokarmowych, astmy lub wyprysku atopowego.Dysbioza, czyli brak równowagi mikroflory jelitowej, może zwiększać ryzyko wystąpienia tych schorzeń.Alergie pokarmowe są spowodowane rozregulowaniem syntezy IgE, ale bakterie komensalne w ludzkiej mikroflorze mogą regulować odpowiedź immunologiczną i zapobiegać rozwojowi alergii pokarmowych.Ekspozycja na drobnoustroje w okresie niemowlęcym może pozytywnie wpływać na rozwój alergii.Leczenie obejmuje immunoterapię alergii pokarmowej, leczenie farmakologiczne, stosowanie prebiotyków i probiotyków.Badania pokazują, że skład mikroflory jelitowej różni się u osób z astmą alergiczną i niealergiczną w porównaniu z osobami zdrowymi, z większym bogactwem, ale mniejszą różnorodnością
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".