MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387296715 · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.17002

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes

2023· review· en· W4387296715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSchool of Medicine, Tokai UniversityNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilClinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve UniversityJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaSchool of Medicine, New York UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesDuke Global Health Institute, Duke UniversityCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthHögskolan DalarnaUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenOtsuka PharmaceuticalKarolinska InstitutetBritish Heart FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungRijksuniversiteit GroningenBoehringer Ingelheim FranceUniversity of New South WalesInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of LeicesterAcademy of Medical SciencesBritish Renal SocietyUniversity of California, San FranciscoGlaxoSmithKlineShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesDiabetes UKKidney Research UKNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesKaiser PermanenteUniversidad de la República UruguayNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumGeisinger Commonwealth School of MedicineGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceTulane UniversityMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health ResearchSanofiNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesMSD FranceUniversity of PennsylvaniaResearch Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesEli Lilly and CompanyBrigham and Women's HospitalWellcome TrustUniversity of OxfordUniversity of DundeeTufts Medical CenterYork UniversityAstraZenecaDuke-NUS Medical SchoolJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of WashingtonImperial College LondonUniversità degli Studi di SalernoAmgen
KeywordsMedicineAlbuminuriaRenal functionCreatinineKidney diseaseCystatin CInternal medicinePopulationUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Chronic kidney disease (low estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] or albuminuria) affects approximately 14% of adults in the US. Objective: To evaluate associations of lower eGFR based on creatinine alone, lower eGFR based on creatinine combined with cystatin C, and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual-participant data meta-analysis of 27 503 140 individuals from 114 global cohorts (eGFR based on creatinine alone) and 720 736 individuals from 20 cohorts (eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C) and 9 067 753 individuals from 114 cohorts (albuminuria) from 1980 to 2021. Exposures: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 equations for eGFR based on creatinine alone and eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C; and albuminuria estimated as urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute kidney injury, any hospitalization, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral artery disease. The analyses were performed within each cohort and summarized with random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Within the population using eGFR based on creatinine alone (mean age, 54 years [SD, 17 years]; 51% were women; mean follow-up time, 4.8 years [SD, 3.3 years]), the mean eGFR was 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 22 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the median UACR was 11 mg/g (IQR, 8-16 mg/g). Within the population using eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C (mean age, 59 years [SD, 12 years]; 53% were women; mean follow-up time, 10.8 years [SD, 4.1 years]), the mean eGFR was 88 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD, 22 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the median UACR was 9 mg/g (IQR, 6-18 mg/g). Lower eGFR (whether based on creatinine alone or based on creatinine and cystatin C) and higher UACR were each significantly associated with higher risk for each of the 10 adverse outcomes, including those in the mildest categories of chronic kidney disease. For example, among people with a UACR less than 10 mg/g, an eGFR of 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on creatinine alone was associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates compared with an eGFR of 90 to 104 mL/min/1.73 m2 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.3]; 161 vs 79 events per 1000 person-years; excess absolute risk, 22 events per 1000 person-years [95% CI, 19-25 events per 1000 person-years]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of 114 cohorts, lower eGFR based on creatinine alone, lower eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C, and more severe UACR were each associated with increased rates of 10 adverse outcomes, including adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular diseases, and hospitalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it