Using Liquid Chromatography—Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry for Detection of Economically Motivated Adulteration of Maple Syrup
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maple syrup is a sought-after commodity, and used as a condiment and a sweetener. Also, it is an active target of economically motivated adulteration (EMA), similar to other foods such as lemon juice and honey. OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to detect low cost sugar adulteration in maple syrup via an internal standard method using malic acid through solid-phase extraction (SPE) and LC with isotope ratio mass spectrometric detection (LC-IRMS). METHODS: In this work, an optimized SPE sample preparation procedure was used for the isolation of organic acids from maple syrup. Using LC-IRMS, malic acid was separated from other organic acids and the δ13C value of malic acid was determined. Eleven maple syrup samples, domestic or imported from Canada, were evaluated for 13C/12C ratios (δ13C values) using combustion module-cavity ring down spectrometry (CM-CRDS) and compared to the δ13C values obtained from well-established elemental analyzer-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS) methods. The δ13C values of isolated malic acid analyzed by SPE-LC-IRMS were used as internal standards and compared to the δ13C values of bulk maple syrup; difference (δ13Csugars - δ13Cmalic acid) values greater than 3.6‰ are indicative of low-cost sugar adulteration. RESULTS: Overall, the results obtained from SPE-LC-IRMS provided a faster, novel analysis approach for determining low-cost sugar adulteration in maple syrup for regulatory purposes. This method also provided lower detectable limits of adulteration versus current literature reports using bulk analysis and comparable detection limits to Tremblay and co-workers who utilized an internal standard method. CONCLUSION: SPE-LC-IRMS is a robust method that can be used for detecting adulteration in maple syrup samples for regulatory purposes. HIGHLIGHTS: SPE-LC-IRMS is a faster, novel analysis approach for determining C4 adulteration in maple syrup with lower detection limits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".