MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387304700 · doi:10.4000/transtexts.2164

通往行星主义的中途——电影《流浪地球》中的流动/不可流动性 (Chinese version)

2022· article· zh· W4387304700 on OpenAlexaff
王侃瑜

Bibliographic record

VenueTranstext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化 · 2022
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsSherritt (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本文聚焦中国科幻大片《流浪地球》,分析电影中三个层面的流动:从地表到地下、地表之上、行星本身,指出流动和不可流动总是相伴而生,一个群体、一个阶段或一个层面的流动总是伴随着另一个群体、阶段或层面的不可流动。电影虽然呈现了跨越国族的世界主义,并将行星本身纳入人类族群的迁徙之中,却并未真正实现完全的行星主义转向,而是停留在了通往行星主义的中途。本文关注生物、资源及能量在不同层面上以不同形式所作的流动,指出其背后暗含的“交通的审美”及技术乐观主义,也强调了这些流动背后所被忽略的边缘群体、其他物种、乃至地球本身的不可流动性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranstext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207