MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387304904 · doi:10.4000/transtexts.2129

De l’Afrique spectrale à l’objet ventriloque. Parcours de la mobilité dans Dakar - Djibouti, 1931. Le butin du musée de l’Homme et L’Afrique fantôme

2022· article· fr· W4387304904 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Harel

Bibliographic record

VenueTranstext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化 · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le film de Marc Petitjean, Dakar – Djibouti, 1931. Le butin du musée de l’Homme et L’Afrique fantôme, un récit de voyage de Michel Leiris, proposent un parcours passionnant sur le thème de la mobilité en contexte colonial. Cet article explore les formes de la mobilité véhiculaire qui obéissent au principe moderniste de la vélocité et de la cartographie du territoire parcouru. En effet, la mission française Dakar-Djibouti est un projet ethnographique ambitieux qui se donne pour tâche de traverser le continent africain à bord de véhicules Ford pendant dix-huit mois. La mise en valeur de cette toute-puissance mécanique s'accompagne du vol d'objets sacrés (les Boli), intégrés par la suite à la collection africaniste du Musée de l’Homme de Paris. L’article envisage la dynamique intermédiale mise au jour entre le film de Petitjean et le récit de Leiris. Le dispositif de contre-enquête que le cinéaste promeut, dans un contexte de restitution muséale et décoloniale, voit le jour alors que la France semble proposer cette initiative à travers un discours prononcé par le président Macron en 2017.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranstext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207