MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387308439 · doi:10.1002/dac.5634

Workload prediction for enhancing power efficiency of cloud data centers using optimized self‐attention‐based progressive generative adversarial network

2023· article· en· W4387308439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Saravanan, A.V. Santhosh Babu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingWorkloadScalabilityData centerData miningArtificial neural networkDeep learningEfficient energy useReal-time computingMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingDatabaseComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Nowadays, future workload prediction is an important requirement in cloud data centers to maintain flexibility and scalability of resources. However, due to unexpected peaks, drops in workload, noise, and redundancy in user requests, there is a considerable variance in resource demands, making it difficult to accurately predict workloads. Therefore, a self‐attention‐based progressive generative adversarial network (SAPGAN) optimized with Giza Pyramids Construction Algorithm (GPCA)‐based workload prediction is proposed for Sustainable Cloud Data Centers (CDC). At first, redundant data in historical data obtained through CDC are filtered utilizing Markov chain random field (MCRF) co‐simulation method. These pre‐processed historical data are supplied to the SAPGAN. The SAPGAN weight parameters are optimized by GPCA. The proposed method is analyzed using 2 benchmark datasets: HTTP traces from Saskatchewan and NASA. The simulation is implemented in JAVA. The performance metrics is examined to verify the efficacy of the proposed technique. The performance of the proposed approach provides 28.70%, 11.87%, and 14.79% higher accuracy; 30.15%, 11.72%, and 18.34% lesser energy consume for the dataset of NASA; and 5.32%, 2.45%, and 5.67% higher accuracy; 12.36%, 24.24%, and 34.16% lesser energy consume for the dataset of Saskatchewan HTTP traces compared with existing methods, such as auto‐adaptive learning in a dynamic cloud environment (AADEA‐WLP‐CDC), a neural network model depending on biphase adaptive learning for anticipating cloud data center workload (BALNN‐WLP‐CDC) and multiple scale ensemble of deep learning framework for multistep‐ahead cloud workload prediction (EMD‐LSTM‐GAN‐WLP‐CDC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Communication SystemsSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207