Workload prediction for enhancing power efficiency of cloud data centers using optimized self‐attention‐based progressive generative adversarial network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Nowadays, future workload prediction is an important requirement in cloud data centers to maintain flexibility and scalability of resources. However, due to unexpected peaks, drops in workload, noise, and redundancy in user requests, there is a considerable variance in resource demands, making it difficult to accurately predict workloads. Therefore, a self‐attention‐based progressive generative adversarial network (SAPGAN) optimized with Giza Pyramids Construction Algorithm (GPCA)‐based workload prediction is proposed for Sustainable Cloud Data Centers (CDC). At first, redundant data in historical data obtained through CDC are filtered utilizing Markov chain random field (MCRF) co‐simulation method. These pre‐processed historical data are supplied to the SAPGAN. The SAPGAN weight parameters are optimized by GPCA. The proposed method is analyzed using 2 benchmark datasets: HTTP traces from Saskatchewan and NASA. The simulation is implemented in JAVA. The performance metrics is examined to verify the efficacy of the proposed technique. The performance of the proposed approach provides 28.70%, 11.87%, and 14.79% higher accuracy; 30.15%, 11.72%, and 18.34% lesser energy consume for the dataset of NASA; and 5.32%, 2.45%, and 5.67% higher accuracy; 12.36%, 24.24%, and 34.16% lesser energy consume for the dataset of Saskatchewan HTTP traces compared with existing methods, such as auto‐adaptive learning in a dynamic cloud environment (AADEA‐WLP‐CDC), a neural network model depending on biphase adaptive learning for anticipating cloud data center workload (BALNN‐WLP‐CDC) and multiple scale ensemble of deep learning framework for multistep‐ahead cloud workload prediction (EMD‐LSTM‐GAN‐WLP‐CDC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".