MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387310511 · doi:10.2175/193864718825158990

Coca Cola Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment System

2023· article· en· W4387310511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Turner Grant, Mike Allison, Shannon Grant, Daniel Bertoldo, Bryan Connerat, Alecia Welsh, Jun Yum

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Water Environment Federation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembrane bioreactorWastewaterEffluentSewage treatmentWaste managementBioreactorAerationEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coca Cola Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment SystemAbstractThe Coca-Cola Company has significantly upgraded the wastewater treatment at their Beverage Base Plant (BBP) in Atlanta, Georgia. Effluent quality has been improved with the upgrade to a biological treatment system known as a membrane bioreactor (MBR) consisting of an aeration tank and two membrane tanks. The membrane tanks make use of flat sheet membrane technology for solids/liquid separation. A screw press was installed for waste solids dewatering. The upgraded wastewater treatment plant ensured improved effluent quality well within the new limits of discharging to the local POTW. Keywords: membrane bioreactor, treatment plant upgrade, flat-plate membrane, beverage wastewater.The Coca-Cola Company has significantly upgraded the wastewater treatment at their Beverage Base Plant (BBP) in Atlanta, Georgia. Effluent quality has been improved with the upgrade to a biological treatment system known as a membrane bioreactor (MBR) consisting of an aeration tank and two membrane tanks. The upgraded wastewater treatment plant ensured improved effluent quality well within the new limits of discharging to the local POTW.SpeakerGrant, TurnerPresentation time13:30:0014:00:00Session time13:30:0015:00:00SessionFood & Beverage: Upgrades and TroubleshootingSession locationRoom S403a - Level 4TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationTopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationAuthor(s)Grant, TurnerAuthor(s)T. Grant 1; M. Allison 2 ; S. Grant 2; D. Bertoldo 3; T. Grant 1; B. Connerat 4; A. Welsh 4; J. Yum 4;Author affiliation(s)Evoqua Water Technologies Canada Ltd., 370 Wilsey Road, Fredericton, NB E3B 6E9 1; Evoqua Water Technologies 2 ; Evoqua Water Technologies 2; The Coca Cola Company 3; Evoqua Water Technologies 1; The Coca Cola Company 4; The Coca Cola Company 4; 4;SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Oct 2023DOI10.2175/193864718825158990Volume / Issue Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2023Word count8

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSame topicWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesFrench-language works237,207