Coca Cola Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coca Cola Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment SystemAbstractThe Coca-Cola Company has significantly upgraded the wastewater treatment at their Beverage Base Plant (BBP) in Atlanta, Georgia. Effluent quality has been improved with the upgrade to a biological treatment system known as a membrane bioreactor (MBR) consisting of an aeration tank and two membrane tanks. The membrane tanks make use of flat sheet membrane technology for solids/liquid separation. A screw press was installed for waste solids dewatering. The upgraded wastewater treatment plant ensured improved effluent quality well within the new limits of discharging to the local POTW. Keywords: membrane bioreactor, treatment plant upgrade, flat-plate membrane, beverage wastewater.The Coca-Cola Company has significantly upgraded the wastewater treatment at their Beverage Base Plant (BBP) in Atlanta, Georgia. Effluent quality has been improved with the upgrade to a biological treatment system known as a membrane bioreactor (MBR) consisting of an aeration tank and two membrane tanks. The upgraded wastewater treatment plant ensured improved effluent quality well within the new limits of discharging to the local POTW.SpeakerGrant, TurnerPresentation time13:30:0014:00:00Session time13:30:0015:00:00SessionFood & Beverage: Upgrades and TroubleshootingSession locationRoom S403a - Level 4TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationTopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationAuthor(s)Grant, TurnerAuthor(s)T. Grant <sup>1</sup>; M. Allison <sup>2 </sup>; S. Grant <sup>2</sup>; D. Bertoldo <sup>3</sup>; T. Grant <sup>1</sup>; B. Connerat <sup>4</sup>; A. Welsh <sup>4</sup>; J. Yum <sup>4</sup>;Author affiliation(s)Evoqua Water Technologies Canada Ltd., 370 Wilsey Road, Fredericton, NB E3B 6E9 <sup>1</sup>; Evoqua Water Technologies <sup>2 </sup>; Evoqua Water Technologies <sup>2</sup>; The Coca Cola Company <sup>3</sup>; Evoqua Water Technologies <sup>1</sup>; The Coca Cola Company <sup>4</sup>; The Coca Cola Company <sup>4</sup>; <sup>4</sup>;SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Oct 2023DOI10.2175/193864718825158990Volume / Issue Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2023Word count8
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".