MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SEMANA DA ENGENHARIA CIVIL DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS: RESULTADOS DO RETORNO PRESENCIAL PÓS PANDEMIA

2023· article· pt· W4387319659 on OpenAlexaff
Liz Andrea Cuevas Sanchez, Karina Jamel de Freitas, Sheyla Mara Baptista Serra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Research in Diverse Fields
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: O presente trabalho apresenta os resultados obtidos durante a XV Semana da Engenharia Civil (SECiv) da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar).A Semana Acadêmica foi organizada pelos atuais alunos da graduação, e tem como objetivo aproximar os estudantes do mercado de trabalho e das diferentes oportunidades existentes no ramo da Engenharia Civil, além de aumentar a sinergia entre as turmas do curso.A XV edição do evento, realizada em 2022, retomou as atividades presenciais, após dois anos de evento na forma remota, tendo um impacto positivo na vida acadêmica dos alunos, o que gerou uma boa avaliação por parte deles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcademic Research in Diverse FieldsFrench-language works237,207