MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387328549 · doi:10.1117/12.2677460

Dispersion-engineered phase change material integrated silicon photonics modulators with controlled insertion losses

2023· article· en· W4387328549 on OpenAlexaff
James O. Davis, Yihao Cui, Behrad Gholipour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhotonicsInsertion lossOptoelectronicsSilicon photonicsDispersion (optics)MetamaterialOptical switchNeuromorphic engineeringPhase modulationOptical modulatorModulation (music)Refractive indexPhotonic metamaterialChalcogenideElectronic engineeringOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic modulators have seen widespread use in optical circuitry, optical processing, and next-generational computing regimes such as neuromorphic computing. Prior research has focused on the incorporation of high-index functional materials on or adjacent to photonic circuit components such as modulators to enhance signal detection, modulation, and generation. The reversible, non-volatile transitions between optically and electrically unique amorphous and crystalline material phases inherent to chalcogenide phase-change materials (PCMs) present a promising material platform for this integration. However, current methods of incorporation combined with lossy material properties lead to integrations having large insertion losses and device footprints. Here we demonstrate that applying metamaterial effective medium theory enables dispersive engineering to drastically reduce insertion losses and footprints in PCM-loaded optical circuitry. Two configurations are explored, a metagrating and a multilayer, in which full-π modulator phase shifts are achieved in compact footprints down to 4.36 and 4.7 𝜇m with low insertion losses at a 1550nm wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207