3D‐Architected Alkaline‐Earth Perovskites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 3D ceramic architectures are captivating geometrical features with an immense demand in optics. In this work, an additive manufacturing (AM) approach for printing alkaline‐earth perovskite 3D microarchitectures is developed. The approach enables custom‐made photoresists suited for two‐photon lithography, permitting the production of alkaline‐earth perovskite (BaZrO 3 , CaZrO 3 , and SrZrO 3 ) 3D structures shaped in the form of octet‐truss lattices, gyroids, or inspired architectures like sodalite zeolite, and C 60 buckyballs with micrometric and nanometric feature sizes. Alkaline‐earth perovskite morphological, structural, and chemical characteristics are studied. The optical properties of such perovskite architectures are investigated using cathodoluminescence and wide‐field photoluminescence emission to estimate the lifetime rate and defects in BaZrO 3 , CaZrO 3 , and SrZrO 3 . From a broad perspective, this AM methodology facilitates the production of 3D‐structured mixed oxides. These findings are the first steps toward dimensionally refined high‐refractive‐index ceramics for micro‐optics and other terrains like (photo/electro)catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".