GA-NIFS: The ultra-dense, interacting environment of a dual AGN at <i>z</i> ∼ 3.3 revealed by JWST/NIRSpec IFS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. LBQS 0302−0019 is a blue quasar (QSO) at z ∼ 3.3 that hosts powerful outflows and resides in a complex environment consisting of an obscured active galactic nucleus (AGN) candidate and multiple companions, all within 30 kpc in projection. Aims. We aim to characterise this complex system using JWST NIRSpec Integral Field Spectrograph (IFS) observations obtained as part of the NIRSpec IFS GTO programme “Galaxy Assembly with NIRSpec IFS” (GA-NIFS); these data cover the QSO rest-frame optical emission lines with a spatial resolution of ∼0.1″ and a sampling of 0.05″ (∼380 pc) over a contiguous sky area of ∼3″ × 3″ (23 × 23 kpc 2 ). Methods. We developed a procedure to correct for the spurious oscillations (or “wiggles”) in NIRSpec single-spaxel spectra caused by the spatial under-sampling of the point spread function. We performed a QSO–host decomposition with the QD EBLEND 3D tools. We used multi-component kinematic decomposition of the optical emission line profiles to infer the physical properties of the emitting gas in the QSO environment. Results. The QSO–host decomposition allows us to identify both a low- and a high-velocity component. The former possibly traces a warm rotating disk with a dynamical mass M dyn ∼ 10 11 M ⊙ and a rotation-to-random motion ratio v rot / σ 0 ∼ 2. The other kinematic component traces a spatially unresolved ionised outflow with a velocity of ∼1000 km s −1 and an outflow mass rate of ∼10 4 M ⊙ yr −1 . We clearly detect eight companion objects close to LBQS 0302−0019. For two of them, we detect a regular velocity field that likely traces rotating gas, and we infer individual dynamical masses of ≈10 10 M ⊙ . Another companion shows evidence of gravitational interaction with the QSO host. Optical line ratios confirm the presence of a second, obscured AGN ∼20 kpc from the primary QSO; the dual AGN dominates the ionisation state of the gas in the entire NIRSpec field of view. Conclusions. This work has unveiled in unprecedented detail the complex environment of LBQS 0302−0019, which includes its host galaxy, a close obscured AGN, and nine interacting companions (five of which were previously unknown), all within 30 kpc of the QSO. Our results support a scenario where mergers can trigger dual AGN and can be important drivers of rapid early supermassive black hole growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".