Bibliographic record
Abstract
El texto explora un asunto a menudo omitido: la funcio?n que desempen?a la noche en la arquitectura y los estudios urbanos. La discusio?n, enmarcada en el a?mbito emergente de los “estudios nocturnos”, destaca el seminario “Montreal by Night”, cuyo eje central fue la tensio?n entre las ima?genes oficiales de la ciudad y sus actividades nocturnas. Alli? se exploraron temas como la historia de las trabajadoras sexuales, la cobertura media?tica y la transformacio?n de los barrios asociadosa la vida nocturna. El arti?culo enfatiza que es necesario planificar y establecer formas inclusivas de gobernanza de la vida nocturna y destaca la importancia de preservar artefactos y archivos efi?meros. En li?neas generales, el texto enfatiza la creciente importancia de los estudios nocturnos en la investigacio?n acade?mica, las poli?ticas pu?blicas y el activismo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".