The effect of low rate of corporate taxation on foreign direct investments (FDI) and gross domestic product (GDP): A case study of ten selected countries (2018-2022)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was undertaken to examine the effect of low corporation tax rate on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflow and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Investors and multinational firms are very rational and therefore prefer to invest in countries where the cost of taxation will be at the barest minimum to maximize their profit. The study aimed to critically analyze the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rates of the randomly selected countries of the world, and their respective impacts on FDI and GDP. The study is descriptive in nature, based on quantitative data, sourced from various reports of Statutory Corporate Income Tax Rates of Tax Foundation, World Bank and UNCTAD World Investment Report of 2022. Ex-post Facto research design was deployed; while data were analyzed with a General Linear Model of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) with the aid of SPSS version 25. The study found that low rate of corporation tax has a positive and significant effect on FDI as well as on GDP. That is, CIT rate is a dominant determinant for FDI and GDP of countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".