New insights on faulting in southwest New Brunswick and northeast Maine based on marine magnetic mapping of the Ministers Island dyke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Passamaquoddy Bay region of southwest New Brunswick and northeast Maine is known for its moderate seismicity, yet the structures responsible for these earthquakes are not well understood. To gain insight on the tectonic history of this region, marine magnetic surveys were conducted at speculated intersections of faults and the Early Jurassic Ministers Island dyke. Analysis of the vertical gradient of the magnetic field strongly suggests that the 189 ± 8 Ma Ministers Island dyke is dextrally offset 370 m by the Oak Bay Fault below the St. Croix River. This sense of motion points to a reversal of fault movement compared to that recorded in much older (Silurian) rocks nearby. The interpretation is supported by magnetic modelling, constrained by direct measurements of the magnetic susceptibility and natural remanent magnetization of the dyke. In Passamaquoddy Bay, however, farther to the east, there is no evidence that slight deviations in the trend of the dyke anomaly or its termination result from post-emplacement faulting. Furthermore, the data suggest that a sub-parallel mafic dyke on the northern shore of Passamaquoddy Bay is either a distinct dyke system or a left stepover emplacement of the Ministers Island dyke, as opposed to a faulted offset as previously speculated. This study illustrates how focused high-resolution magnetic surveys can strengthen interpretations of faulting in areas of geological ambiguity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".