MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387361004 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.669

FRI157 Systematic Germline Genetic Analysis In A Cohort Of Adults With Primary Aldosteronism And Hypertension Onset ≤35 yo : Low Yield Of Genetic Pathogenic Variants

2023· article· en· W4387361004 on OpenAlexaff
Stéfanie Parisien‐La Salle, Dumas Nadine, Zaki El-Haffaf, André Lacroix, Isabelle Bourdeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary aldosteronismGermlineFamily historyHypokalemiaSecondary hypertensionPediatricsInternal medicineGeneticsBlood pressureBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: S. Parisien-La Salle: None. D. Nadine: None. Z. El-Haffaf: None. A. Lacroix: None. I. Bourdeau: None. Introduction: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common but underdiagnosed cause of hypertension. Although most cases are sporadic, up to 5% of patients have a familial form of PA. Current guidelines recommend germline genetic analysis in patients who present PA < 20 yo or have a family history of PA. As PA is underdiagnosed, we hypothesized that some patients with PA do not undergo germline genetic screening since familial history of PA is unrecognized. Objective: To evaluate the yield of systematic germline genetic analysis for familial PA in patients with PA, hypertension detection ≤ 35 yo and a family history of hypertension. Methods: From 2012-2022, patients diagnosed with PA (positive ARR and confirmatory testing), hypertension onset ≤ 35 yo and a family history of hypertension were offered genetic counselling for germline screening for known familial causes of PA. After informed consent, patients underwent germline analysis for the chimeric gene CYP11B2/CYP11B1 (Ruhr University Bochum, Germany) and a multigene panel including KCNJ5, CACNA1D, CACNA1H and CLCN2 genes (Fulgent, CA). Results: Twenty-five patients consented for genetic analysis. Thirteen patients (52%) were female. In regards to ethnic origin, 52% were French Canadians, 24% African-Americans and the other 24% was split between Asian, European and Middle Eastern descent. The mean age at diagnosis of hypertension was 28.3 yo and 39.7 yo at PA diagnosis. At PA diagnosis, 91.3% (21/23) had previous hypokalemia and 12% (3/25) a cortisol co-secretion (1 mg dexamethasone test> 50 nmol/L). Approximately 13% were on one hypertension drug, 30% on two, 26% on three, 26% on four and 5% were on five medications. Comobordities included: 8% atrial fibrillation, 20% obstructive sleep apnea and 4% coronary heart disease. All patients had a family history of hypertension, 5 patients (20%) had a family history of stroke, and 1 patient (4%) had a family history of PA. Of the patients who had already undergone adrenal vein sampling (n=22), 68.2% (15/22) underwent an adrenalectomy for lateralised aldosterone secretion and 31.8% (7/22) were treated with medical therapy for bilateral disease. None of the 24 patients who underwent testing for glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism were found to have the chimeric gene CYP11B2/CYP11B1. Twenty-three patients underwent the multigene panel and no pathogenic variants were identified. However, 4/23 (17,4%) patients carried a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in CACNA1H or CLCN2 genes (CACNA1H c.1315C>T(p.Arg439Cys),CACNA1H c.3868G>A(p.Val1290Ile),CACNA1H c.1939G>A (p.Gly647Ser), CLCN2 c.2402C>T, (p.Thr801Ile)). Conclusion: Systematic germline genetic testing for familial PA in this cohort of patients with PA, hypertension diagnosis ≤ 35 yo and a family history of hypertension did not yield positive results. Although PA is an underdiagnosed disease, familial forms remain very rare. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207