MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387361117 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.1567

OR09-05 GPBAR1- Understanding Its Function In The Secretory Endometrium

2023· article· en· W4387361117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Saad‐Naguib, Patrick Timmins, Lea George, Cherie‐Ann Samuels, Nataki C. Douglas, Andy V. Babwah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecidualizationEndometriumDeciduaPlacentationG protein-coupled receptorBiologyEmbryoPregnancyStromal cellReceptorCell biologyEndocrinologyAndrologyInternal medicinePlacentaMedicineCancer researchSignal transductionGeneticsFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: M. Saad-Naguib: None. P. Timmins: None. L. George: None. C. Samuels: None. N. Douglas: None. A.V. Babwah: None. Every successful pregnancy relies on implantation of an embryo into a receptive uterine endometrium. While implantation failure accounts for 50% of pregnancy failures, it remains the least understood aspect of pregnancy. In the mid-secretory (MS) phase of the menstrual cycle, under the influence of progesterone and cAMP, fibroblasts decidualize, a critical requirement for implantation. Decidualization involves the differentiation of stromal fibroblasts into secretory epithelioid cells that contribute to the formation of the decidua, the support of the pregnancy prior to placentation. A defective decidua can lead to implantation failure, but if implantation occurs, it could compromise placenta formation and function. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in mouse endometrial receptivity and decidualization. GPCRs are transmembrane signaling molecules that are ubiquitously expressed in the body and regulate almost every cellular and physiological process. They are major pharmaceutical targets, with 35% of all the drugs approved by the US FDA targeting GPCRs. To identify novel GPCR regulators of embryo implantation, we conducted bulk RNA sequencing of the human endometrium at the periovulatory (PO) and mid-secretory (MS) phase in natural menstrual cycles in healthy women of reproductive age and observed that genes encoding 11 GPCRs, not previously reported to regulate implantation, were differentially expressed between these two time points. Among these was the gene encoding the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1), and this was upregulated 4.6-fold in the MS vs PO phase. Single cell RNA sequence analysis showed that within the human endometrium, GPBAR1 mRNA expression is mostly and strongly localized to stromal fibroblasts. Upon activation by secondary bile acids, GPBAR1 couples to Gαs leading to an increase in intracellular cAMP levels. We hypothesize that in the MS endometrium, upon ligand binding, GPBAR1 produces cAMP and induces human endometrial stromal cell (HESC) decidualization. This hypothesis is being tested in vitro using primary HESCs. Interestingly, in the pregnant mouse, GPBAR1 mRNA is barely expressed at the implantation site on E7.5, and therefore unlikely plays a role in stromal cell decidualization in the mouse. Whether Gpbar1 is expressed in the pregnant mouse endometrium prior to implantation and plays a role in regulating endometrial receptivity is being investigated. Overall, our studies have uncovered a GPCR, that to our knowledge, has not been previously described in the human endometrium. Our data show that the expression of this GPCR is upregulated at the time of endometrial stromal cell decidualization, and therefore it might regulate decidualization and/or be required for decidual function in women. These possibilities are being examined. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207