SAT614 Clinical, Laboratory And Imaging Features Associated With Central Diabetes Insipidus (Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency) In Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: S. Vaid: None. J. Estrada-Veras: None. W. Gahl: None. P. Nicholas: None. R. Dave: None. B. Gochuico: None. K. O'Brien: None. F. Hannah-Shmouni: None. S. Shekhar: None. Background: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-Langerhans, histiocytic multisystemic disorder commonly associated with somatic pathogenic variants in the BRAF or MAPK pathways. In ECD, diabetes insipidus (DI) is among the most common endocrinopathies and is often the presenting feature. We analyzed the prevalence and the genetic, biochemical, and imaging features associated with DI in subjects with ECD. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of subjects with biopsy-confirmed ECD was conducted from January 2011 to December 2018 at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Subjects underwent molecular genetics, baseline biochemical and pituitary endocrine function studies, and dedicated pituitary MRI. DI was diagnosed based on clinical and biochemical features. Other endocrinopathies were diagnosed based on standardized criteria. Continuous data were analyzed using t-tests or nonparametric tests between subjects with and without DI. Categorical data were analyzed via Fisher's exact tests. Results: Sixty-one subjects with ECD [23 females (37.7%) and 38 males (62.3%)] were evaluated. Twenty-three subjects (38%) had DI, with a higher percentage of males (87%) vs females (13%). DI subjects compared to those without DI were younger [mean (SD):50.1(10.4) vs 57.5 (14.5) years; p=0.01] and had a higher prevalence of BRAF V600E pathogenic variants [76.19% vs 39.47%; p<0.01], lower IGF-1 [mean (SEM):136.5 (13.87) vs 161.67(10.22) ng/mL; p=0.02], and lower urine osmolality [466.6 (±260.18) vs 641.05 (±179.7) mOsm/kg; p<0.01]. DI subjects also had a higher prevalence of central hypogonadism [78% vs 34%; p<0.01], a higher prevalence of panhypopituitarism [39% vs 0%; p <0.01] and a higher number of anterior pituitary deficits [mean (SEM):1.23 (1.15) vs 0.56 (0.67); p =0.01] than non-DI subjects. Subjects with DI had a higher frequency of absent posterior pituitary bright spots [61% vs 21%; p<0.01] compared to those without DI. There were no differences in BMI, serum prolactin, vasopressin, serum osmolality, serum sodium, total cholesterol or hsCRP. The frequencies of central adrenal insufficiency, central hypothyroidism and abnormal pituitary imaging were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: DI is among the most common endocrinopathies in Erdheim-Chester disease. In DI subjects, a higher burden of anterior pituitary endocrinopathies, BRAF V600E pathogenic variants and absence of the posterior pituitary bright spot was noted, which may allow for early stratification and targeted clinical management. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".