MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387362116 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.325

SAT321 Ectopic ACTH Cushing's Syndrome Caused By A Large-cell Neuroendocrine Lung Carcinoma Responding To Desmopressin

2023· article· en· W4387362116 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphanie Larose, Dany Rioux, Roula Albadine, André Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-QuébecCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Adrenocorticotropic hormoneMetyraponeInternal medicineDesmopressinCushing syndromeEndocrinologyPathologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: S. Larose: None. D. Rioux: None. R. Albadine: None. A. Lacroix: None. Background: Ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) is a less frequent cause of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (CS), most often caused by a thoracic neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) with EAS are rare and usually present a more severe phenotype of ACTH secretion and hypercortisolism. Clinical Case: We report the case of a 44-yo non-smoking man, who presented clinical and biochemical evidence of ACTH-dependent severe CS complicated by pulmonary emboli. In the context of an initial equivocal pituitary MRI, desmopressin and CRH stimulation tests were performed. Desmopressin produced a 157% increase in ACTH (basal: 59.0 pmol/L to peak: 151.9 pmol/L) and a 25% increase in cortisol from baseline; there was no stimulation of ACTH or cortisol during a CRH test and no suppression with high dose dexamethasone tests. Repeat pituitary MRI identified a 5 mm lesion, but inferior petrosal venous sinus sampling (IPSS) under desmopressin did not identify a central ACTH source. Thorax and abdominal imaging including Indium-111 octreoscan identified a left lung 3 mm micronodule which became more evident when pulmonary emboli resolved. In this context of probable ectopic ACTH secretion, the patient was treated with left inferior lung lobectomy for a suspected NET. Pathological studies confirmed a lung LCNEC with morphologic features of carcinoid tumor and strongly positive ACTH immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the primary lesion and lymph node metastasis. The patient was in CS remission after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, but developed a CS recurrence 9.5 years later, with a morning ACTH of 56.9 pmol/L, (N <11.0 pmol/L), a non-suppressed AM cortisol of 633 nmol/L after 1mg of dexamethasone overnight and urinary free cortisol of 1717 nmol/24 hours (N:< 789). Imaging showed signs of recurrence, with a hypermetabolic, 14 x 11 mm left hilar lymph node lesion on a TEP-DOTATATE scan in the left lung, near the surgical suture. An endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed the recurrence of the LCNEC. Surgery was performed and demonstrated again positive ACTH IHC of the lesion. The patient achieved remission of CS with secondary adrenal insufficiency, treated with hydrocortisone. Six months later, there was no response of ACTH or cortisol to a desmopressin test. Conclusion: This is the first report of LCNEC with morphologic feature of carcinoid tumor of the lung with ectopic ACTH secretion stimulated by desmopressin. Long delay prior to metastatic recurrence indicates relatively indolent NET. This case report indicates that response to desmopressin can occur in malignant LCNEC. Combining the desmopressin test with other dynamic tests, sellar MRI, IPSS and thoraco-abdominal functional imaging improves diagnostic accuracy of ectopic ACTH source. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207