MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387362607 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.1995

SAT523 Molecular Profile of Local vs. Regional Aggressive Thyroid Cancer: A Multicenter Study

2023· article· en· W4387362607 on OpenAlexaff
Idit Tessler, Nir A. Gecel, Rick Payne, Galit Avior, Alon Eran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLymphovascular invasionThyroid cancerGenotypePerineural invasionDiseaseRetrospective cohort studyGastroenterologyOncologyCancerMetastasisGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: I. Tessler: None. N. Gecel: None. R. Payne: None. G. Avior: None. A. Eran: None. Background: Genetic testing for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer has rapidly evolved in recent years. While commonly applied for diagnosis, its role in predicting genotype-phenotype correlation and guiding management is emerging. Here we evaluate differences in the molecular profile of local vs. regional aggressive disease. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent molecular profiling for DTC between 2018-2021, dividing them into three groups: low-risk, locally aggressive, and regional aggressive. We analyzed the patients' basic characteristics, disease aggressive features (extranodal extension, perineural invasion), lymphovascular invasion, and extrathyroidal extension), and the mutation distribution according to disease aggressiveness. Genetic variants were stratified by risk levels according to the 2015 ATA guidelines. Results: The study included a total of 652 patients, 414 in the low-risk group, 73 in the locally aggressive group, and 165 in the regional aggressive group. The regional aggressive group had the lowest age at diagnosis (mean age of 44.64±13.78 years vs. 52.52±14.53 and 53.58±14.93 for the low-risk and locally-aggressive, respectively, p>0.001), the highest rate of mutation-positive nodules (86.1% vs. 6.6% and 67.1%), and the highest rate of aggressive mutation (76.4% vs. 17.6 and 39.7). On the contrary, RAS mutations were more common in the low-risk (31.4% vs. 19.2% and 6.1% in the local- and regional aggressiveness groups). Conclusion: This study showed that local and regional aggressive thyroid cancer has a distinct molecular profile, with a higher prevalence of high-risk mutations in the regional group. These findings may enhance the use of genetic testing in predicting disease aggressiveness and guiding management in thyroid cancer. Presentation Date: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→