MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387363839 · doi:10.53967/cje-rce.5541

Incidence de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur le bienêtre et la santé mentale des équipes1 de direction d’école : une recherche-action collaborative en milieux francophones minoritaires dans l’Ouest2 canadien

2023· article· fr· W4387363839 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jules Rocque, Cynthia Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche-action collaborative vise à mieux comprendre l’incidence de la COVID-19 sur le bien-être et la santé mentale des membres (n = 63) des équipes de direction d’écoles en milieux francophones dans l’Ouest canadien. Les résultats obtenus, à la suite de l’analyse à l’aide du logiciel SPSS des réponses recueillies par questionnaire en ligne, révèlent que même si ces gestionnaires manquent de temps, ils demeurent engagés et éprouvent un sentiment de satisfaction. Moins de la moitié trouvent l’équilibre famille-travail et presque 40 % d’entre eux éprouvent de la difficulté à dormir la nuit. Les personnes ayant moins d’expérience en administration scolaire semblent plus durement touchées, plus de 75 % des répondants reconnaissent ressentir de l’anxiété et les stratégies de gestion du stress adoptées sont nombreuses. L’étude exploratoire souligne l’importance de se soucier de la santé mentale et du bien-être des membres de l’équipe de direction et de réfléchir aux ressources requises pour les soutenir dans l’exercice de leurs fonctions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207