MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387364801 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.308

Design of an Automatic Water Faucet System Using the IOT Based HC-SR04 Sensor

2023· article· en· W4387364801 on OpenAlexaff
Rio Sinaga, Novriyenni Novriyenni, Siswan Syahputra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocontrollerInternet of ThingsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Container (type theory)ArduinoSoftwareNode (physics)RelayEmbedded systemEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water is a vital element for humans, many activities are related to water. In everyday life, the use of water becomes very important and necessary in various fields, such as households, industry and agriculture. But their use is often inefficient and has the potential to waste valuable resources. In this context, the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) emerges as a potential solution by connecting physical objects via the internet. This research designs and builds an IoT-based automatic water faucet system using the HC-SR04 sensor to measure the water level in a container. Hardware components such as Node mcu Esp8266, Infrared Sensor, 2 channel 5v Relay, and others are used to control the system automatically. The software used includes the Arduino IDE. This system aims to intelligently monitor and control water flow, prevent water wastage, and incorporate the advantages of IoT technology to create an automatic water faucet system that is responsive to water levels and the presence of objects in front of it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207