MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387369423 · doi:10.1177/09596518231199205

Model-based event/self-triggered fixed-time consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems

2023· article· en· W4387369423 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Computer scienceMulti-agent systemNonlinear systemNetwork topologyDistributed computingConsensusTopology (electrical circuits)Event (particle physics)Control theory (sociology)Computer networkMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address model-based event-triggered fixed-time consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems with both fixed topology and switching topologies, a novel model-based event-triggered protocol is presented. In the proposed protocol, agents in multi-agent systems update controllers by utilizing estimated state values in the triggered intervals. And for reducing the burdens of bandwidth further, the model-based event-triggered protocol is extended to self-triggered protocol which does not need continuous communication in triggered intervals. It is proven that Zeno behavior is excluded. Our main contributions are giving a novel distributed model-based event-triggered protocol for fixed-time consensus and extending it into a self-triggered protocol. Finally, a couple of simulation examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it