MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387375431 · doi:10.1175/waf-d-23-0074.1

A Probabilistic Prediction of Rogue Waves from a WAVEWATCH III Model for the Northeast Pacific

2023· article· en· W4387375431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWeather and Forecasting · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Victoria
FundersPublic Safety Canada
KeywordsRogue waveSignificant wave heightHindcastSea stateCrestWind waveWave powerGeologyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyClimatologyStatisticsNonlinear systemMathematicsOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rogue waves are stochastic, individual ocean surface waves that are disproportionately large compared to the background sea state. They present considerable risk to mariners and offshore structures especially when encountered in large seas. Current rogue wave forecasts are based on nonlinear processes quantified by the Benjamin Feir index (BFI). However, there is increasing evidence that the BFI has limited predictive power in the real ocean and that rogue waves are largely generated by bandwidth-controlled linear superposition. Recent studies have shown that the bandwidth parameter crest–trough correlation r shows the highest univariate correlation with rogue wave probability. We corroborate this result and demonstrate that r has the highest predictive power for rogue wave probability from the analysis of open ocean and coastal buoys in the northeast Pacific. This work further demonstrates that crest–trough correlation can be forecast by a regional WAVEWATCH III wave model with moderate accuracy. This result leads to the proposal of a novel empirical rogue wave risk assessment probability forecast based on r . Semilogarithmic fits between r and rogue wave probability were applied to generate the rogue wave probability forecast. A sample rogue wave probability forecast is presented for a large storm 21–22 October 2021. Significance Statement Rogue waves pose a considerable threat to ships and offshore structures. The rare and unexpected nature of rogue wave makes predicting them an ongoing and challenging goal. Recent work based on an extensive dataset of waves has suggested that the wave parameter called the crest–trough correlation shows the highest correlation with rogue wave probability. Our work demonstrates that crest–trough correlation can be reasonably well forecast by standard wave models. This suggests that current operational wave models can support rogue wave prediction models based on crest–trough correlation for improved rogue wave risk evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it