Effect of leading-edge geometry on flow beneath a simulated ice block
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present article conducted detailed velocity measurements beneath simulated ice blocks with different leading-edge geometries (round, rectangular, upward and downward triangular). The results examined flow separation at the leading-edge, vortex generation, and subsequent vortex propagation. The instantaneous velocity field depicts an unsteady flow dominated by large-scale vortices, with the Kelvin–Helmholtz type instability dominating the shear layer interface. The mode of vortex generation and propagation was influenced by the geometry of the leading edge. These vortices were dominant for the rectangular and upward triangular configurations. Propagation of these vortices creates low-pressure zones beneath the simulated ice block, which can affect the ice block stability. For all ice blocks, the mean flow accelerated, due to flow separation, and this can result in fluctuations in the dynamic pressure field. These events can lead to greater under-turning moments, as well as the interfacial melting of the ice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".