MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387376600 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.289

Diagnosis of Baby Blues Syndrome sing the Certainty Factor Method (Case Study: FULL BETHESDA Hospital)

2023· article· en· W4387376600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluesFeelingCertaintyMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryPediatricsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baby blues syndrome is a psychological disorder experienced by women after giving birth, such as feeling excessively upset and sad, and tired for no apparent reason. About 80% of women who have just given birth will experience Baby blues Syndrome, if this continues and is prolonged it will be very dangerous for the health of the mother and baby. From the problems above, the hospital needs to have an additional system that can help make it easier for the medical team to speed up handlers in analyzing and diagnosing Baby blues Syndrome suffered by patients using the certainty factor method. The purpose of this research is to build an expert system for diagnosing the symptoms of Baby blues syndrome using the certainty factor method. Based on the results of the CF calculation, the highest score is the type of baby blues syndrome with a value of 0.9602 or 96.02%. From the results obtained, the system identified that the patient had a type of baby blues syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it