Pendampingan Edukasi Hak-Hak Konsumen Pengguna Jasa Transportasi Udara Berdasarkan Konvensi Montreal 1999
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hak-hak pengguna jasa transportasi udara, khususnya dalam lingkup penerbangan internasional telah diatur dalam Konvensi Montreal 1999 ( vide Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2016). Masyarakat Jawa Timur, khususnya di Surabaya sering melakukan perjalanan ke luar negeri, mengingat tingkat ekonomi yang baik. Wilayah tersebut merupakan wilayah kerja Yayasan Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen (YLPK) Jawa Timur. Tujuan dari kegiatan ini adalah untuk memberikan pendampingan dalam hal penggunaan dan pemahaman Konvensi Montreal 1999, mengingat sosialisasi terkait hal ini masih sangat minim. Metode yang digunakan melalui beberapa tahap, pertama persiapan dan perijinan dengan kelompok mitra; kedua identifikasi latar belakang pendidikan individu anggota mitra, pengalaman bekerja dan pengetahuan regulasi bidang penerbangan; ketiga pemaparan materi dua arah interaksi langsung tentang pengalaman lapangan dari para individu mitra yang dikombinasikan dengan transfer pengetahuan dari sisi akademik. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah anggota mitra dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan pengguna jasa transportasi udara bisa mengkombinasikan peraturan terkait perlindungan konsumen, penerbangan, dan Konvensi Montreal 1999.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".