MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387376623 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.296

Application of the Clustering Algorithm for the Classification of General Criminal Cases at the Binjai District Attorney's Office

2023· article· en· W4387376623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisCommissionMathematicsLawComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Binjai District Attorney's Office in carrying out its duties and functions, one of which handles general crimes, where so far the SPDP (Warranty to Commence Investigation) from the police that has entered the Binjai District Prosecutor's Office amounted to approximately 50 (fifty) cases each month. This amount consists of several types of general criminal cases. It is known that the types of general criminal cases amount to approximately 215 (two hundred and fifteen) types of cases, from this data, a method of classifying/clustering is needed from the types of cases that exist each month so that the data can be processed so as to produce the highest, moderate and highest scores. the lowest value of a type of case. The Binjai District Attorney's Office often receives requests for data from other ministries or agencies such as the BPS (Central Statistics Agency), the National Commission on Women and the National Commission on Children in the form of data recapitulation of crimes against women and children as perpetrators of crimes. The Binjai District Attorney's Office has a case handling system where the recapitulation cannot be taken directly but instead collects data manually, because the existing case handling system does not have the recapitulation as requested.The application of clustering has been carried out by many previous researchers. Among them, the K-Means Clustering Algorithm Analysis Mapping the Number of Crimes. The research was carried out using a data mining model in classifying illegal fishing with the K-Means algorithm analysis by determining the shortest distance using the eulclidean distance, more optimal than using the mahattan distance and chbchep distance in classifying student achievement, determining the centroid (central point) in the early stages of the algorithm K-Means is very influential on cluster results as the results of tests carried out using 267 records with different centroids produce different cluster results as well, a clustering model is obtained that can be used for illegal fishing in decision making for illegal fishing crimes high, medium, moderate .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it