Classification Of Population Data On Status In The Family Based On Last Education And Work Using The Clustering Method (Case Study: Sei Prison Village Office)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population data is structured individual or individual data through population registration, civil registration and population census activities. It is important to know population data because in making policies and planning regional or state development, population data is needed to describe the condition of an area. Population data include births, deaths, transfers or migration, population composition, population density and so on. This grouping is done so that population data that is already in the archives will be input into an application that will be designed to make it easier for parties who need data without having to look at the data that is still manual. The problems that exist are such as the increase in the number of residents in a city, village or even a district which is increasing while the population that has been recorded still does not have a job, such as status in the family, namely the head of the family is still there who does not work in terms of recent education can still be considered to get a job that matches the last type of education. From the research process conducted on 20 data, 3 groups were obtained, Cluster 1 contained 16 data, Cluster 2 contained 1 data, and Cluster 3 contained 3 data. And the most group obtained is cluster 1, there is education last high school, has a type of work that has not worked and status in the family of the head of the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it