Use of Case Based Reasoning (CBR) Methods to Diagnosis Diseases in Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diseases in pregnant women are diseases that many people need to pay attention to, because diseases that occur in pregnant women will not only endanger one life, but more than that. Hypertension currently occupies the 2nd position as a type of disease that threatens the lives of many pregnant women. The application of Case Based Reasoning (CBR) in diagnosing diseases that occur during pregnancy is motivated by the difficulty of consulting an obstetrician due to costs, time or even the limited number of doctors in a hospital. The use of CBR aims to solve new problems by adapting solutions to problems that occurred before. The expert system itself is one of the solutions to solve problems faced by users in the health sector, this system can minimize costs incurred to consult about diseases in pregnancy to specialist doctors. "Use of Case Base Reasoning (CBR) to Diagnose Diseases in Pregnancy" is expected to help the general public, especially pregnant women, make a simple diagnosis of symptoms and diseases in pregnancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".