Application of Data Mining in Analyzing the Effect of Parents' Employment and Education Level on Student Behavior Using the A PRIORI Method (Case Study: SDN 024769 Binjai)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavior is a person's reaction to a stimulus that comes from the external environment. Parents are one of the main factors in the formation of children's behavior. This study aims to find out the effect of parents' work and education on student behavior. By using RapidMiner in testing 234 SDN 024769 Binjai student data, using the Apriori method and setting a minimum support value of 8% and 70% confidence, 1207 rules were obtained in the entire set and 2 rules in 9 itemsets. And the best rule with the highest value is obtained, if the father's job is self-employed, the mother's job is self-employed, the father's last education is high school, the mother's last education is high school, the time the father spends working is more than 8 hours per day, the time the mother spends working is more than 8 hours per day, the time the father spends on family is every day, and the time the mother spends on family is every day then the student has good behavior at school, with a support value of 8.5% and a certainty value of 95.2%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it