MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387380125 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.642

FRI130 Usefulness Of The Upright Posture Test In The Diagnosis Of Primary Aldosteronism

2023· article· en· W4387380125 on OpenAlexaff
Nada Younès, Matthieu St‐Jean, M. Desrochers, Isabelle Bourdeau, André Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary aldosteronismAldosteronePlasma renin activityHyperaldosteronismHypokalemiaInternal medicineSupine positionAmbulatoryUrologyRenin–angiotensin systemEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: N. Younes: None. M. St-Jean: None. M. Desrochers: None. I. Bourdeau: None. A. Lacroix: None. Objectives: Renin-independent aldosterone excess characterizes primary aldosteronism (PA). We have previously shown that PA is frequently regulated by aberrant stimuli, including the upright posture stimulation test (UPT), in which plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) increase in a renin-independent manner. In this study, we further examined the usefulness of UPT in diagnosing PA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 187 adult patients who underwent an UPT as part of their evaluation for possible PA and 25 control subjects, in 2 referral university centers between January 2011 and December 2021. UPT was conducted in an ambulatory setting, mostly in patients with potential false negative or borderline results of oral/IV saline confirmation tests. UPT was performed in a fasting state, early morning, 72 hours off beta-blockers, ACE, or ARBS. Patients were in a supine posture for 1 hour, followed by ambulation for 2 hours. Blood samples were collected for PAC, renin, and cortisol, at baseline and at 30 minutes intervals during ambulation. An abnormal response was defined as a ≥50% rise in PAC with a suppressed renin (≤10.1 ng/L or ≤1 ng/mL/h) and a cortisol increase ≤50%. Results: Median age of patients was 55.0 [IQR (46.0; 63.0)], 52.4% were female. 93.6% were taking at least one antihypertensive medication and 32% had hypokalemia. 43.5% did not have adrenal nodules at imaging. 76.5% (n=143) were diagnosed with PA, based on either IV/oral sodium load or UPT. When compared to controls, PA patients had higher basal PAC and lower basal renin levels (p<.0001) and achieved a higher maximal PAC and lower maximal renin (renin max) in response to posture [median PAC (IQR): 802.0 pmol/L (569.0, 1244.0) in PA v/s 624.0 pmol/L (500.0, 736.0) in controls, p=0.0081 and median renin 5.0 ng/L [IQR (3.0, 8.0)] in PA v/s 27.5 ng/L in controls (19.0, 46.0); p<.0001]. Renin max ≤10.1 had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting PA (90% and 92%, respectively). 95.3% of PA patients increased PAC by at least 50% on UPT (median increase 363%), while renin remained suppressed. All 42 PA patients with a false negative (PAC ≤162 pmol/L) on IV saline test had a renin max ≤10.1 during UPT and 97.6% increased aldosterone by at least 50%. 84% of PA patients with a borderline response (162-240 pmol/L) on IV saline test, had a renin max ≤10.1 and all patients increased aldosterone by at least 50%. 42 patients underwent adrenal vein sampling: 50% had lateralized PA (potassium was lower than in bilateral PA, p=0.003). However, the aldosterone and renin response to UPT did not significantly differ between the two subtypes of PA. Conclusion: A renin-independent aldosterone increase during UPT can be used to confirm PA diagnosis, which was particularly useful in patients with false negative saline loading tests. Renin-independent PAC response to UPT occurred equally in lateralized and bilateral PA. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207