MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387383302 · doi:10.47467/jdi.v5i3.4304

Strategi Perencanaan Pendidikan Islam

2023· article· en· W4387383302 on OpenAlex
Sri Aisyah Amini, Jamilus Jamilus

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Dirosah Islamiyah · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamInstitutionStrategic planningWaqfField (mathematics)Public relationsSociologyPolitical scienceManagement scienceBusinessEngineeringMarketingSocial scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planning is a series of activities carried out in preparation for decision making about what should happen and what will be done. The importance of proper planning in the field of Islamic education, because Muslims consider Islamic education as the best way of life for a person. Ideally, Islamic education must have a good and systematic planning strategy so that Islamic education truly succeeds for all Muslims in the world and the hereafter. . If there is a planning strategy, it can lead the institution to the right and appropriate goals. The method used in this study is the type or approach of literature (Library Research). The data collection technique used in this study is the document technique, which seeks information about the topics discussed in the form of notes, books, publications or articles, magazines, and others.
 Keywords: Planning Strategy, Islamic Education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it