MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387385672 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322193

Data-Efficient MADDPG Based on Self-Attention for IoT Energy Management Systems

2023· article· en· W4387385672 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Al-Saffar, Mustafa Gül

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceScalabilityExploitDependency (UML)Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceMachine learningComputer securityDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the simulated real-world Demand Response (DR) potential is controlled and optimized when household load characteristics are analyzed based on historical data information. To determine the optimal DR potential in smart homes integrated with IoT energy management systems, a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework can be one of the best solutions to handle various household appliances’ control activities associated with stochastic nature. However, the main problem with multi-agent systems is a nonstationary environment that is arisen by the agents. Consequently, this can cause more system uncertainties. Hence, it requires an excessive number of interactions with the environment for training which leads to a data inefficient reinforcement learning model. Thus, we propose a new approach using a Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient based on Bi-directional Long Short Term Memory and Attention Mechanism (BiLSTMA-MADDPG) to extract more useful information. Therefore, we developed an improved MADDPG model that exploits the BiLSTM layer to store a history of experience in the MADDPG’s replay buffer, and the Attention Mechanism to reduce the model dependency upon the number of samples since it can extract the most valuable data and ignore the less important ones. In this way, BiLSTMA-MADDPG can perform better than the conventional MADDPG even with the small sample environment to motivate the exploration of a more robust and data-efficient regime. Therefore, the attention mechanism enables MADDPG to be more effective and scalable in learning in complex real-world multi-agent environments. Simulation results are obtained for a household environment with three cooperated agents to control the following devices, washing machine, air conditioner, and electric vehicle. The model performance is validated, showing an improvement to the data efficiency and convergence speed, and a promise for a real-life application in terms of appliance energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207