MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387387407 · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-8000

Developing Character Height Model for Tibetan–Chinese Bilingual Guide Signs Using Driving Simulation

2023· article· en· W4387387407 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSafety Warnings and Signage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)PsychologyLinguisticsHistoryMathematicsPhilosophyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of Tibet’s most vital traffic safety devices, guide signs are usually Tibetan–Chinese bilingual. Therefore, drivers need effective recognition of Tibetan–Chinese bilingual traffic signs for safe driving. This study aims to determine two design parameters of the Tibetan–Chinese bilingual guide signs: Tibetan character height (hT) and aspect (height to width) ratio. Two highway facilities were selected for the simulation experiment: a general highway intersection and a high-grade highway exit ramp. To incorporate drivers’ visual recognition characteristics, 20 Tibetan drivers and 20 Han drivers were invited to wear head-mounted eye trackers for a dynamic driving simulation experiment of visual identification of guide signs. Four layout designs were used to analyze Tibetan and Han drivers’ visual recognition characteristics. The regression model for hT was first developed based on the visibility theory of guide signs. Then, the character-height design values for the Tibetan–Chinese bilingual guide signs were established for different speed limits. The results of this study should help to optimize the design of traffic signs in Tibet and improve highway traffic safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it