MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387397857 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.a903332

Playing Through the Pain: Ken Caminiti and the Steroids Confession that Changed Baseball Forever by Dan Good (review)

2023· article· en· W4387397857 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Willie Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyLegendConfession (law)BrotherShadow (psychology)Art historyArtCharacter (mathematics)LiteratureHistoryPsychoanalysisLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Playing Through the Pain: Ken Caminiti and the Steroids Confession that Changed Baseball Forever by Dan Good Willie Steele Dan Good. Playing Through the Pain: Ken Caminiti and the Steroids Confession that Changed Baseball Forever. New York, NY: Abrams Press, 2022. 378 pp. Cloth, $27.00. Oftentimes, when starting a sports biography, readers find themselves identifying with a character and hoping for a positive ending for a heroic figure. Baseball fans from the late 1980s to the early 2000s will immediately remember Ken Caminiti, but his story is one of immense physical talent, legendary competitiveness, and demons that haunted him for years. Rather than finding a happy ending to this story, fans are instead taken on a journey that they already know will end tragically, a story made even sadder when they see the third baseman's career end and his life spiral downward. When reading Dan Good's biography of the tortured Caminiti, most often identified with the Houston Astros and the San Diego Padres, these fans might already know the story of the player's work ethic that made him a legend at Leigh High School in San Jose, California. Though in his early years he "was a pint-sized boy stuck in his brother's shadow" (18), by his sophomore year, "his athletic talent couldn't be ignored" (19). That talent, combined with his legendary workout regimen, were showcased against a backdrop of drug and alcohol use, something that "was ingrained in the region's DNA" (21) around San Jose and the Cambrian Park neighborhood where Caminiti lived. By the time he took the field for San Jose City College, despite the team's [End Page 148] success and his own reliable defense on the hot corner and power at the plate, "his partying became a concern" for coaches as there were whispers "that Ken likes to drink . . . Sometimes there were hints about drugs" (31). Frustrated by the time at City College and pressured by his father to become a switch hitter, Caminiti transferred to San Jose State where, in spite of even more legendary tales of drinking, he played well enough to earn an invitation as one of the thirty-one top college prospects with the hopes of making the 1984 Olympic team, a squad which would play as a demonstration sport before baseball returned to the Olympics as a full-fledged sport four years later. And while he ultimately was left off the final twenty-man roster, it showed him (and everyone who watched him) that he had the skills to lead him to a career in the major leagues. Good masterfully tells a story of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: the gifted third baseman who was described by the Columbus Astros manager as "the next Brooks Robinson" and the man with "one of those trapdoor gullets what allowed him to chug" (69). Relying on interviews with former coaches and teammates and newspaper accounts from his playing career, Good's narrative unfolds as though it's in real time while readers know of the tragic clouds looming on Caminiti's horizon. The dual reputation followed Ken Caminiti to the major leagues when he was called up to the Houston Astros in the summer of 1987: "He played hard, and he partied just as hard" and he was "caught between grown-up responsibilities and youthful indiscretions" (83). Finishing his rookie year with a .246 batting average and impressive play at third base and marrying his high school girlfriend in the off-season should have given him incentive to clean up his life and focus on becoming the best player and husband he could be. However, as Good recounts, "he still wasn't ready to slow down" (86). With the Astros today being one of Major League Baseball's most successful franchises over the past five seasons, it might be easy for readers to forget the team's ups and downs from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s. But while Good's account focuses almost entirely on Caminiti, he provides a solid retrospective of the franchise, building around players like Darryl Kile, Craig Biggio, and Jeff Bagwell. Perhaps the most impressive part of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207