Network connectivity and local transcriptomic vulnerability underpin cortical atrophy progression in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson's disease pathology is hypothesized to spread through the brain via axonal connections between regions and is further modulated by local vulnerabilities within those regions. The resulting changes to brain morphology have previously been demonstrated in both prodromal and de novo Parkinson's disease patients. However, it remains unclear whether the pattern of atrophy progression in Parkinson's disease over time is similarly explained by network-based spreading and local vulnerability. We address this gap by mapping the trajectory of cortical atrophy rates in a large, multi-centre cohort of Parkinson's disease patients and relate this atrophy progression pattern to network architecture and gene expression profiles. Across 4-year follow-up visits, increased atrophy rates were observed in posterior, temporal, and superior frontal cortices. We demonstrated that this progression pattern was shaped by network connectivity. Regional atrophy rates were strongly related to atrophy rates across structurally and functionally connected regions. We also found that atrophy progression was associated with specific gene expression profiles. The genes whose spatial distribution in the brain was most related to atrophy rate were those enriched for mitochondrial and metabolic function. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that both global and local brain features influence vulnerability to neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".