MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387401647 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.332

Design Of Electric Switching Systems For Electronic Equipment In Home Based Internet of Thing (IoT)

2023· article· en· W4387401647 on OpenAlexaff
GOESTI MESKANA PELAWI PELAWI, Achmad Fauzi, Milli Alfhi Syari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocontrollerComputer scienceAndroid (operating system)Internet of ThingsEmbedded systemElectronicsIncandescent light bulbComputer hardwareMobile deviceThe InternetElectrical engineeringOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tool for designing an IoT-based electronic equipment switch system has been designed. This system uses the NodeMCU ESP 8266 microcontroller where the NodeMCU ESP8266 functions as a data processor, and also as a receiver for wi-fi networks emitted by wi-fi network systems. This tool system uses a control system using an Android smartphone to turn on and off switches for electronic devices at home, this tool uses a Wi-Fi network communication system so that the device system and Android smartphone can be connected, in this tool system it uses a DC fan and incandescent lamps as outputs. connected to an electrical switch system, and the switch can turn on and turn off electronic devices on designed devices. The smartphone application used in this design is the Blynk application which can be downloaded at Playstore or Google.com. This tool is expected to help and facilitate humans in controlling electronic equipment at home both at home and when traveling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207