MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387402050 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.354

Decision Support System at PDAM Tirta Sari City of Binjai Using the Decision Tree Method in Determining Maintenance Actions for Clean Water Distribution Networks

2023· article· en· W4387402050 on OpenAlexaff
Imam Hidayat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision treeRanking (information retrieval)Distribution (mathematics)Water supplyMathematicsOperations researchComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water is a very important need for human survival, without water there would be no life on earth. Every region should have clean water service management for community needs, especially in Binjai City which is managed by PDAM Tirta Sari, a company owned by the Binjai City government. Problems that often occur during this time are that water distributed to residents sometimes experiences problems such as difficulty in flowing water to residents' homes, leaks in distribution pipes, dirty water or smelly water if there is heavy rain. Based on the problems above, it is necessary to observe the causes of problems that occur in the distribution of clean water in the city of Binjai. As the community grows and the increasing number of people requesting the installation of new drinking water meters causes pressure on water distribution in the Binjai area, there is a problem of not being able to distribute water normally, therefore it is necessary to examine which areas need to be improved so that water distribution can be even by applying algorithms. DecisionTree. Based on the problem of maintaining the clean water distribution network, it requires a decision-making method that is able to accommodate complex problems, which provides a value to support a decision. One method that can be used is a decision tree. This method is a method that tries to find discrete approximation functions, and was built using the ID3 algorithm (Interative Dychotomizer Version 3), and for ranking using risk analysis. The system is designed using the PHP programming language with a MySQL database. From the results of the decision tree above, it is known that node 1.1 is routine inspection, routine maintenance is carried out to check problems that occur in the field with the aim of ensuring that water distribution can flow normally to residents' homes, node 1.2 monitors water quality, node 1.3 pipe maintenance, node 1.4 changes equipment and nodes 1.5 checking water pressure, where the PDAM will check the water pressure if it is known that the water in the reservoir has decreased, then it is ensured that the distributed water pressure reaches the minimum standard so that the water can reach residents' homes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207