MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387402172 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101897

87P Macrophage ontogeny underlies functional programs and drives brain tumor progression

2023· article· en· W4387402172 on OpenAlexaff
Meng-Lin Yu, Lindsay A. Wilson, Sylvain Doré, Lysanne Desharnais, Sarah M. Maritan, Elham Karimi, Dongmei Zuo, Peter M. Siegel, Logan A. Walsh, Daniela F. Quail

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTumor microenvironmentMicrogliaCytotoxic T cellDendritic cellHaematopoiesisImmunologyCancer researchProgenitor cellChemokineMajor histocompatibility complexMonocyteMacrophageTumor progressionBone marrowImmunotherapyImmune systemStem cellCancerInflammationCell biologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer with an overall survival of 15 months despite aggressive cytotoxic treatments. Therefore, identifying new therapeutic targets within the tumor microenvironment (TME) is critical for improving patient outcomes. In glioblastoma, macrophages make up to 30% of the bulk tumor, which include both yolk-sac derived tissue-resident microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) that are recruited from the bone marrow during inflammation. During hematopoiesis, MDMs can arise from granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMPs) or monocyte-dendritic cell progenitors (MDPs), which give rise to neutrophil-like or dendritic cell-like lineages, respectively. Although MDMs as a whole are often considered tumor-promoting, the functional role of specific MDM ontogenies is not known. Our recent study identified a subset of MPO+ MDMs associated with better overall survival, enhanced cytotoxic function, and gene expression suggestive of a GMP origin. Therefore, the aim of this study is to characterize the role of MDM ontogeny in brain tumor progression. Using a combination of RNA-sequencing, in vitro functional assays and in vivo fate-mapping tools, we assessed the functional role of macrophage ontogeny in glioblastoma models. Additionally, we adoptively transferred monocytes cultured ex vivo from distinct developmental origins to trace their recruitment to tumors and assess the subsequent impact on tumor growth. Interestingly, macrophage ontogeny was associated with differences in MHC I-mediated and MHC II-mediated antigen presentation as well as unique profile of cytokines and chemokines, including MPO. Additionally, we found differences in phagocytosis towards glioma cells and upregulation of different inflammatory pathways. Importantly, adoptive transfer of monocytes of distinct ontogenies had opposing effects on brain tumor progression and resulted in significant changes to the TME and peripheral immune system. Our findings shed light on the developmental origins of brain tumor MDMs and their putative regulatory impact in the TME.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207