MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387405388 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.146

THU616 Analysis Of Germline Mutations In Patients With Sporadic Adrenocortical Carcinoma

2023· article· en· W4387405388 on OpenAlexaff
Massimo Terzolo, Salvatore Grisanti, Maria Scatolini, Pasquale Tomaiuolo, Enrico Grosso, Vittoria Basile, Deborah Cosentini, Soraya Puglisi, Marta Laganà, Paola Perotti, L. Saba, Elisa Rossini, Sandra Sigala, Marco Volante, Alfredo Berruti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdrenocortical carcinomaMSH2Internal medicineMSH6GermlineMedicineOncologyProportional hazards modelGermline mutationCancerColorectal cancerGeneticsBiologyGeneMutationDNA mismatch repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: M. Terzolo: None. S. Grisanti: None. M. Scatolini: None. P. Tomaiuolo: None. E. Grosso: None. V. Basile: None. D. Cosentini: None. S. Puglisi: None. M. Laganà: None. P. Perotti: None. L. Saba: None. E. Rossini: None. S. Sigala: None. M. Volante: None. A. Berruti: None. Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer associated with hereditary syndromes in 10% of cases. Germline variants (GVs) in patients with ACC have been identified mainly in pediatric patients and in family cases, while data on GVs in adult patients with sporadic ACC are limited. Methods: We analyzed germline DNA from 150 adult patients with sporadic ACC sequentially referred to our centers between 1998 and 2019. We designed a custom panel of 17 genes potentially involved in the pathogenesis of ACC: AIP, APC, ARMC5, ARNT, BRCA1, BRCA2, CTNNB1, IGF2, MEN1, MSH2, MSH6, PDE8B, PDE11A, PRKACA, PRKACB, PRKAR1A, and TP53. NGS data were analyzed by a semi-automated bioinformatic pipeline. All GVs were studied using effect predictor tools (PolyPhen and SIFT). Specific databases (ClinVar, Varsome, gnomAD, IARC TP53, HGMD) were used for variant classification according to ACMG criteria. Variants interpreted as pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) were considered as positive. Clinical, pathological and genomic data were analyzed in different Cox models to study prognostic impact of covariates for disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 21 unique GVs in 24/150 patients (16%). GVs were found in 9 genes including APC (n=3), ARMC5 (n=3), MSH2 (n=3), PDE11A (n=3), TP53 (n=3), MSH6 (n=2), PDE8B (n=2), AIP (n=1) and CTNNB1 (n=1). Eleven positive GVs including 3 GVs with deleterious potential were found in 14/150 patients (9.3%). Some variants were particularly enriched, with a frequency of 0.02% compared to an overall frequency of 0.001-0.004% in the gnomAD database. We found a new GV in TP53 (G105D) in a patient who was later found to have a sister with ACC and, for the first time, 3 GVs in ARMC5 (P731R). Patients with ARMC5 GVs had large cortisol-secreting tumors and one case displayed pathologic features of ACC and combined macronodular cortical disease. Positive GVs were associated with a shorter OS (50 vs 142 months, HR 1.81; 95%CI, 0.86-3.82, p=0.118) and PFS (8 vs 30 months, HR 3.11; 95%CI, 1.57-6.16, p=0.001) but not DFS (27 vs 32 months, HR 1.07; 95%CI, 0.52-2.22, p=0.845). At multivariate analysis, known clinical factors (age, surgery of primary ACC, ENSAT stage, hypercortisolism) were found to have prognostic impact on OS. However, GVs remained independent predictors of PFS and OS in metastatic patients. Conclusions: In a series of 150 patients with ACC, we found that 9.3% of them had positive GVs, thus confirming findings from the TCGA analysis. We describe for the first time the presence of ARMC5 GVs in patients with ACC and we found a novel pathogenic variant of TP53. Pathologic features of one ARMC5 case suggest a possible progression from macronodular hyperplasia to ACC. Finally, the present findings suggest that GVs can affect ACC progression and survival of affected patients. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207