Digital Signature Security Analysis By Applying The Elgamal Algorithm And The Idea Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of an all-digital era, all activities use digital technology. Including signatures, hands are no longer manual now, signatures can be modified digitally. The application of digital signatures can be used to allow for document authenticity issues. The signature combines two methods namely Elgamal Algorithm and IDEA. The Elgamal algorithm is used to encrypt and decrypt signatures. The IDEA algorithm is used to strengthen signatures so that others don't modify them. The signature process begins with generating the public and private keys. The process of generating public keys (p,q,g,y) and private keys. With the signature of a binary document that is given by the sender to the recipient, the authenticity of the contents of the file, the identity of the sender, and the files that have been received by the recipient can be guaranteed. Affixing a digital signature is done by encrypting it with the sender's private key. In this way, checking the authenticity of documents and senders can be done.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it