MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correction of Current Measurement Scaling and Offset Errors for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives

2023· article· en· W4387411769 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Zuo, Xizhe Zhang, Chunyan Lai, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffset (computer science)Computer scienceTorqueControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsHarmonicError detection and correctionCurrent (fluid)Harmonic analysisObservational errorScalingElectromagnetic coilMachine controlAlgorithmElectronic engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringVoltageControl (management)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current measurement errors in permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drives can lead to undesired torque and speed ripples, significantly impairing control performance. To address this issue, this paper presents a novel online current error correction method for PMSM drives. The proposed approach takes into account both current scaling errors and offset errors, aiming to achieve precise error correction without relying on signal injection or prior knowledge of machine parameters. First, the relation between the different types of current errors and the machine speed harmonic is derived, laying the foundation for current measurement correction. Then, the speed harmonic is explored to search for actual current errors with the gradient descent algorithm. By minimizing the specific order of speed harmonics, the proposed algorithm achieves precise correction for current measurement errors without signal injection or knowledge of machine parameters. Through extensive simulation studies, the efficacy of the proposed current error correction algorithm is thoroughly validated. The results demonstrate significant improvements in control performance, confirming the method's ability to mitigate both current offset and scaling errors in a PMSM drive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207