MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387413213 · doi:10.1353/abr.2023.a902835

Ceive by B. K. Fischer (review)

2023· article· en· W4387413213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovellaArtWitnessArt historyLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Ceive by B. K. Fischer Kathryn Weld (bio) ceive B. K. Fischer BOA Editions Ltd. https://www.boaeditions.org/products/ceive 120 pages; Print, $17.00 "Gather your wits, girlie. You sit up on a pile of towels by the defunct sump pump—dead quiet, no hum." Thus begins B. K. Fischer's Ceive, a verse novella. Who is speaking? To whom? The omniscient narrator is witness to her own story, and the perspective is disorienting. The ground shifts—and would it not shift, continually, if the world were to flood for days, weeks, months, and all solid ground were to disappear? Would one not talk to oneself? We discover [End Page 105] the narrator-protagonist to be a suburban mother named Val, survivor of an apocalyptic flood, who boards a container ship bound for Newfoundland. Power stations blow, children go missing; bridges and tunnels collapse. Fischer's spare language in "Recapitulate" frames a harrowing scene: At your feet, jackets. Jackets with kidsin them—face up or down. You reacheddown the way you reached at her birth before the birth was done, came upwith hands like that. Wind knockedback: clouds churning over the river.Frame: Trumpet case. Funnel cloud. Fischer has an uncanny ability to orient the reader visually. Over and over again in reading Ceive, I tumbled over tonal echoes of the work of old masters. For example, "Recapitulate" for me summons Pieter Bruegel's painting Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, memorialized by W. H. Auden in "Musée des Beaux Arts." Perhaps this resonance is caused by the neutral pallet, or by the relentlessness of the forward motion of the narrative, despite the chaos. The effect is to highlight the terror of our own societal indifference to the impending climate disaster. Rescued from her cellar by Roy, the UPS man, "Get up, he says. There's a ship that's getting out." Val, after a frank assessment—the fifty-fourth adult on board, unable to bear more children—is accepted as passenger and crew member. She is given responsibility for Crispin, "greasy and delicate with downy limbs," a boy with autism who can do mathematics. First and foremost, Ceive reimagines the biblical narrative of the flood in the present day. Indirectly, Ceive engages with the long tradition of seafaring epics. It is impossible not to hear the echo of a canon that includes The Odyssey, The Icelandic Sagas, Moby-Dick. More overtly, Ceive is in visible conversation with a substantive collection of contemporary writers. For example, Fischer intentionally channels Pound's translation of The Seafarer (1911), its text having been "atomized, and dispersed throughout the book." In addition, Fischer acknowledges the textual influences of Genesis and Shakespeare and the thematic influence of Timothy Morton's Dark Ecology [End Page 106] (2016). Individual poems borrow lines or details from authors such as Ingrid Lilly, Elizabeth Kolbert, Kurt Schwitter, Darcy Steinke, and Hélène Cixous. The text is further energized by visual references to artists like Joan Miro and Leonardo da Vinci. The cumulative effect of all this borrowing is dynamic. The created world vibrates on multiple levels—etymological, ecological, pictorial. The italicized inserted texts are undifferentiated from italicized speech. The effect is almost like collage. Initially, when a reader is trying to distinguish voices, this is disorienting. On a second reading I found it exciting. In Val's world, everything—people, objects, even language itself—seems to be articulate. The sentient individual finds herself eavesdropping as a multitude of intelligent voices weighs in. What a privilege to wake to such a world. At the same time, how arduous. Here is an example from the prose poem "N 40° 51'/W 73° 57'": now it's just the catenary, the swoop of its unloaded cables after the deck dropped. Dire sea surge. The boy looks up and squints, then shouts, find the area under the shaded region. You pull him under the landing, try to get him to sit down. He swings his Nike satchel and dumps out his things, commingled souvenirs and prophesies, lines them up on the deck—a Florida magnet, a tiny Eiffel Tower, a blue spiky massage ball...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207