MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387414222 · doi:10.5334/bc.353

Impact of 2050 tree shading strategies on building cooling demands

2023· article· en· W4387414222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings and Cities · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShadingTree plantingNeighbourhood (mathematics)Thermal comfortArchitectural engineeringCanopyEnvironmental scienceTree canopyTree (set theory)Environmental resource managementComputer scienceGeographyMeteorologyAgroforestryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As urban heatwaves become more severe, frequent and longer, cities seek adaptive building cooling measures. Although passive building design, energy-efficient materials and technologies and mechanical means are proven cooling methods, the potential of nature-based solutions (particularly trees as shading elements) has been understudied despite its significant opportunity. Using a new framework to explore this at the neighbourhood level, three future (2050) potential tree planting strategies are modelled for increasing tree volume and canopy cover and their impacts assessed for summer building-level solar radiation absorption (SRA) and building cooling energy demand (BCED) for a densifying neighbourhood in Vancouver, Canada. The boldest tree planting strategy, with 287% more trees than baseline and 16% canopy cover, reduced neighbourhood-scale total SRA (22%) and BCED (48%) over a no-trees scenario. BCED reductions of up to 64% for retrofitted/redeveloped buildings and 53–79% for low/medium-height buildings (mostly single-family residential) were associated with targeted south-side tree planting. Taller/larger buildings (predominantly mixed use) and buildings along north–south-oriented streets (mainly commercial and mixed use) encountered more tree shading challenges and would require more site-specific interventions. The methodology presented provides a framework to assess current and potential future shading and cooling energy benefits through various tree planting strategies. Practice relevance This research illustrates the tree shading and cooling potential to improve indoor liveability, reduce energy demand and reduce vulnerabilities amidst mounting extreme heat risks. This novel framework and method can be used by planners and urban designers to understand the potential cooling reduction and to develop tree planting and management strategies for effective shading and indoor cooling at the neighbourhood scale. Based on a case study neighbourhood in Vancouver for 2050 climate scenarios, this research shows increased tree volume and canopy cover can significantly reduce building SRA and BCED during the summer. The level of tree shading impact on buildings’ SRA and BCED was associated with the intensity and location of tree planting, but also the relative amount of lower height (and smaller) buildings. The boldest tree planting strategy yielded a 48% reduction in energy demand for cooling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it